A comparative study on the RFS program of Korea with the US and UK

Jung Yull Shin, Gun Woo Kim, Janet S. Zepernick, Kyu Young Kang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

In 2016, the global environmental impact of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissionswas 49.3 gigatons CO2 equivalent. Worldwide, the transportation sector is responsible for 14% of GHG. Electric vehicles (EV) powered by less-polluting energy sources are one way to reduce the environmental impact of the transportation sector, but immediate transportation demands cannot be met by existing EV technology. Use of less polluting biofuel in place of petroleum-based gasoline or diesel fuel to power the existing transportation fleet is a widely accepted transitional solution, including in the Republic of Korea. The purpose of this research is to investigate approaches to biofuels in the US and the UK in order to evaluate Korea's current energy policies related to use of biofuels and to make recommendations for strengthening Korea's energy policy. This article addresses only policies for use of biodiesel rather than ethanol (widely used in the US) because ethanol is not used in Korea. This research shows that Korea calculates GHG using the principle that biofuel is carbon neutral, but energy policies in the US and the UK treat biofuel as not entirely carbon neutral. Korea should examine how to calculate GHG from biodiesel according to the standard set by the UK in order to work toward a more environmentally sustainable energy policy.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4618
JournalSustainability (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 5 Dec 2018

Keywords

  • Biodiesel
  • CO
  • Carbon neutral
  • GHG
  • RFS (Renewable Fuel Standards)
  • Renewable energy
  • Sustainability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study on the RFS program of Korea with the US and UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this