TY - JOUR
T1 - A Systematic Review of Companion Diagnostic Tests by Immunohistochemistry for the Screening of Alectinib-Treated Patients in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
AU - Kang, Sulim
AU - Woo, Jaehyun
AU - Kim, Sungmin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 by the authors. Li-censee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - Companion diagnostic tests and targeted therapy changed the management of non-small cell lung cancer by diagnosing genetic modifications and enabling individualized treatment. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the clinical applicability of companion diagnostic tests (IHC method) by comparing the effects of alectinib and crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. We searched for literature up to March 2022 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing the effective-ness of alectinib and crizotinib using an IHC-based companion diagnostic test. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). PFS was longer in alectinib (68.4 [61.0, 75.9]) than crizotinib (48.7 [40.4, 56.9]). This indicated that alectinib had a superior efficacy to that of crizotinib (HR range 0.15–0.47). In all secondary outcomes, alectinib was better than crizotinib. Particularly for the ORR, the odds ratio (OR) confirmed that alectinib had a lower risk rate (OR: 2.21, [1.46–3.36], p = 0.0002, I2 = 39%). Therefore, the companion diagnostic test (immunohistochem-istry) is an effective test to determine whether to administer alectinib to ALK-positive NSCLC pa-tients.
AB - Companion diagnostic tests and targeted therapy changed the management of non-small cell lung cancer by diagnosing genetic modifications and enabling individualized treatment. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the clinical applicability of companion diagnostic tests (IHC method) by comparing the effects of alectinib and crizotinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. We searched for literature up to March 2022 in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials comparing the effective-ness of alectinib and crizotinib using an IHC-based companion diagnostic test. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS). PFS was longer in alectinib (68.4 [61.0, 75.9]) than crizotinib (48.7 [40.4, 56.9]). This indicated that alectinib had a superior efficacy to that of crizotinib (HR range 0.15–0.47). In all secondary outcomes, alectinib was better than crizotinib. Particularly for the ORR, the odds ratio (OR) confirmed that alectinib had a lower risk rate (OR: 2.21, [1.46–3.36], p = 0.0002, I2 = 39%). Therefore, the companion diagnostic test (immunohistochem-istry) is an effective test to determine whether to administer alectinib to ALK-positive NSCLC pa-tients.
KW - alectinib
KW - ALK
KW - companion diagnostic test
KW - immunohistochemistry
KW - non-small cell lung cancer
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131136151&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics12051297
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics12051297
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85131136151
SN - 2075-4418
VL - 12
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
IS - 5
M1 - 1297
ER -
