Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing

Hohyun Kim, Hyeong Joon Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Financial regulators often react to crises by restricting short-selling to stabilize the stock market. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Korean government banned short-selling in 2020. Since 2021, it has allowed partial resumption only for stocks indexed in KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150. This unique short-selling regime in Korea makes newly indexed or excluded stocks experience exogenous variations in their short-selling availability when the constituents of the two indices are updated. Using this quasi-natural experimental setting, we examine the impact of short-selling permission and ban. The results show that short-selling permission enhances stocks’ price efficiencies while short-selling permission and ban do not strongly influence stock return or volatility. Overall, this paper provides empirical evidence supporting the positive role of short-selling, further casting doubts on the reasons behind banning short-selling.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)393-420
Number of pages28
JournalKorean Journal of Financial Studies
Volume53
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024

Keywords

  • Emerging market
  • Price efficiency
  • Quasi-natural experiment
  • Regulatory intervention
  • Short selling

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this