Abstract
Financial regulators often react to crises by restricting short-selling to stabilize the stock market. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Korean government banned short-selling in 2020. Since 2021, it has allowed partial resumption only for stocks indexed in KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150. This unique short-selling regime in Korea makes newly indexed or excluded stocks experience exogenous variations in their short-selling availability when the constituents of the two indices are updated. Using this quasi-natural experimental setting, we examine the impact of short-selling permission and ban. The results show that short-selling permission enhances stocks’ price efficiencies while short-selling permission and ban do not strongly influence stock return or volatility. Overall, this paper provides empirical evidence supporting the positive role of short-selling, further casting doubts on the reasons behind banning short-selling.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 393-420 |
| Number of pages | 28 |
| Journal | Korean Journal of Financial Studies |
| Volume | 53 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- Emerging market
- Price efficiency
- Quasi-natural experiment
- Regulatory intervention
- Short selling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of Short-selling Effects Using KOSPI200 and KOSDAQ150 Indexing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver