TY - JOUR
T1 - Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis
T2 - A Review of its Current Clinical Application
AU - Im, Gun Il
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Korean Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Society 2025.
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - Background: Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) has gained acceptance as a safe orthobiologic for treating osteoarthritis (OA), despite lacking robust supporting evidence. Although several publications have documented the use of BMAC in OA, evidence confirming its unequivocal efficacy remains limited. Methods: This review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence regarding BMAC as a therapeutic for OA, while also presenting the author’s perspective. Sixteen studies were reviewed, including ten randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and six cohort studies. Results: From the review of existing literature, BMAC injections do not appear to significantly improve pain and function compared to conventional therapies such as hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids, although some studies report a longer duration of effectiveness. Furthermore, the evidence for structural improvement, which was the original rationale for cell therapy, is seldom reported. Conclusion: In light of these findings, it is suggested that high-quality data from a large patient cohort is needed to determine the role of BMAC injections in OA treatment and address reimbursement issues. From the author’s perspective, the introduction of a national registry system that provides valuable information on the cost-effectiveness of various orthopedic procedures may offer a solution.
AB - Background: Bone marrow aspiration concentrate (BMAC) has gained acceptance as a safe orthobiologic for treating osteoarthritis (OA), despite lacking robust supporting evidence. Although several publications have documented the use of BMAC in OA, evidence confirming its unequivocal efficacy remains limited. Methods: This review aims to summarize the current clinical evidence regarding BMAC as a therapeutic for OA, while also presenting the author’s perspective. Sixteen studies were reviewed, including ten randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and six cohort studies. Results: From the review of existing literature, BMAC injections do not appear to significantly improve pain and function compared to conventional therapies such as hyaluronic acid and corticosteroids, although some studies report a longer duration of effectiveness. Furthermore, the evidence for structural improvement, which was the original rationale for cell therapy, is seldom reported. Conclusion: In light of these findings, it is suggested that high-quality data from a large patient cohort is needed to determine the role of BMAC injections in OA treatment and address reimbursement issues. From the author’s perspective, the introduction of a national registry system that provides valuable information on the cost-effectiveness of various orthopedic procedures may offer a solution.
KW - Bone marrow aspiration concentrate
KW - Osteoarthritis
KW - Regenerative medicine
KW - Therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217242982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s13770-024-00693-7
DO - 10.1007/s13770-024-00693-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 39841351
AN - SCOPUS:85217242982
SN - 1738-2696
VL - 22
SP - 159
EP - 166
JO - Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
JF - Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
IS - 2
M1 - e2022222
ER -