Comments on “A Rankine-Timonshenko-Vlasov beam theory for anisotropic beams via an asymptotic strain energy transformation”

Ravi Kumar Kovvali, Dewey H. Hodges, Wenbin Yu, Heung Soo Kim, Jun Sik Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

In their paper (Kim and Kim, 2013), Kim and Kim presented predictions that exhibited significant differences in bending-shear coupling for the CUS box beam from their own analysis vis-à-vis from VABS (Yu et al., 2002, 2012). The actual differences between results obtained from VABS (Yu et al., 2002, 2012) and the RTV theory (Kim and Kim, 2013), when executed properly, are shown herein to be very minor. Indeed, both stiffness models yield very acceptable results for a static analysis. Specifically, VABS does not significantly deviate, qualitatively or quantitatively, from 3D FEM predictions, in contrast to results presented in Kim and Kim (2013).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)359-360
Number of pages2
JournalEuropean Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids
Volume60
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Anisotropic beams
  • Mixed variational theorem
  • VABS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on “A Rankine-Timonshenko-Vlasov beam theory for anisotropic beams via an asymptotic strain energy transformation”'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this