Correction to: Towards Big Data Electricity Theft Detection Based on Improved RUSBoost Classifiers in Smart Grid (Energies, (2021), 14, 23, (8029), 10.3390/en14238029)

There was an error in the original publication [1]. A correction has been made to Introduction, Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11: “power vitality” was changed to “power supply”; “off chance” was changed to “other hand”; “electricity conveyance” was changed to “electricity supply”; “force framework” was changed to “power supply framework”; “force utilization” was changed to “power supply utilization”; “electric force” was changed to “electric supply”; “brilliant lattice” was changed to “smart grid”; “vitality” was changed to “electricity”; “misfortunes” was changed to “line faults”; “keen framework” was changed to “smart grid”; “not kidding sort of issue of various electric organizations” was changed to “very critical matter for almost all electric supply organizations”; “blunder rate” was changed to “error rate”; “Progressed Metering Infrastructure” was changed to “Advanced Metering Infrastructure”; “brilliant” was changed to “smart”; “such a lot of keen” was changed to “smart”; “defeat” was changed to “overcome”; “shopper” was changed to “consumer”; “conduct” was changed to “pattern”; “Unaided techniques decide oddities without earlier information about clients’ conduct, and administered strategies decide both typical just as anomalous conduct utilizing a regulated characterization that requires pre-grouped information” was changed to “Unsupervised techniques decide anomalies without earlier information about clients’ utility, and monitoring strategies decide for both normal and abnormal electricity utilizing”. Corrections were also made to Related Work, Paragraph 6, 8, 9, 10: “assault” was changed to “attack”; “vitality” was changed to “electricity”; “faults” was changed to “false”; “Information” was changed to “Data”; “burden checking” was changed to “load monitoring”; “bunching load occasions” was changed to “accumulated load events”. In the original publication [1], the quality of Figure 4 was low. The updated Figure 4 appears below. In the original publication [1], the caption for Figure 6 was not detailed enough. The correct caption appears below. Figure 6. ROC Curve of Proposed vs Existing Methods. The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.