Corrigendum to “College students' social media use and communication network heterogeneity: Implications for social capital and subjective well-being” (Comput. Hum. Behav. (2017) 73 (620–628) (S0747563217301905), (10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.033))

The authors apologize that the corrections for the highlighted parts and reference list entries were inadvertently left out of the revision. The correct information is listed below. Highlight Network heterogeneity mediates the effects of social media use on social capital and well-being.References Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge. Diener, E. D., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D. W., Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In Diener E. (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener, Social Indicators Research Series, 39 (pp. 247–266). Netherlands: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-491-2354-4_12. Freedman, J. L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(5), 778–780. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0022670. Gangadharbatla, H. (2008). Facebook me: Collective self-esteem, need to belong, and internet self-efficacy as predictors of the Igeneration's attitudes toward social networking sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 8(2), 5–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2008.10722138. Greenwood, S., Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2016). Social media update 2016. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/. Kim, Y. (2015). Does disagreement mitigate polarization? How selective exposure and disagreement affect political polarization. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 915–937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699015596328. Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349–368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x. Lampe, C., Ellison, N., & Steinfield, C. (2006). A face(book) in the crowd: Social searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th Anniversary Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 167–170). New York: ACM Press. Lecheler, S., Bos, L., & Vliegenthart, R. (2015). The mediating role of emotions news framing effects on opinions about immigration. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(4), 1–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077699015596338. Newhagen, J. E., & Rafaeli, S. (1996). Why communication researchers should study the internet: A dialogue. Journal of Communication, 46(1), 4–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460–2466.1996.tb01458.x. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster. Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In J. M. Carroll (Eds.), Human-computer interaction (HCI) in the new millennium (pp. 247–272). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Valkenburg, P., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 9(5), 584–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9.584. Wills, T. A. (1991). Social support and interpersonal relationships. In M. S. Clask (Ed.), Prosocial behavior (pp. 265–289). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Yoo, J. H., & Jeong, E. J. (2016). Psychosocial effects of SNS use: A longitudinal study focused on the moderation effect of social capital. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 108–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.011.