TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of electromagnetic field (PEMF) exposure at different frequency and duration on the peripheral nerve regeneration
T2 - in vitro and in vivo study
AU - Hei, Wei Hong
AU - Byun, Soo Hwan
AU - Kim, Jong Sik
AU - Kim, Soochan
AU - Seo, Young Kwon
AU - Park, Joo Cheol
AU - Kim, Soung Min
AU - Jahng, Jeong Won
AU - Lee, Jong Ho
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2015 Taylor and Francis.
PY - 2016/8/2
Y1 - 2016/8/2
N2 - Purpose: The purpose was to clarify the influence of frequency and exposure time of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on the peripheral nerve regeneration. Materials and methods: Immortalized rat Schwann cells (iSCs) (1 × 102/well) were exposed at four different conditions in 1 mT (50 Hz 1 h/d, 50 Hz 12 h/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12h/d). Cell proliferation, mRNA expression of S100 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were analyzed. Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were divided into six groups (n = 10 each): control, sham, 50 Hz 1 h/d, 50 Hz 12 h/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12 Hr/d. Mental nerve was crush-injured and exposed at four different conditions in 1 mT (50 Hz 1 Hr/d, 50 Hz 12 Hr/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12 h/d). Nerve regeneration was evaluated with functional test, histomorphometry and retrograde labeling of trigeminal ganglion. Results: iSCs proliferation with 50 Hz, 1 h/d was increased from fourth to seventh day; mRNA expression of S100 and BDNF was significantly increased at the same condition from first week to third week (p <.05 vs. control); difference score was increased at the second and third week, and gap score was increased at the third under 50 Hz 1 h PEMF compared with control while other conditions showed no statistical meaning. Axon counts and retrograde labeled neurons were significantly increased under PEMF of four different conditions compared with control. Although there was no statistical difference, 50 Hz, 1 h PEMF showed highest regeneration ability than other conditions. Conclusion: PEMF enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration, and that it may be due to cell proliferation and increase in BDNF and S100 gene expression.
AB - Purpose: The purpose was to clarify the influence of frequency and exposure time of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) on the peripheral nerve regeneration. Materials and methods: Immortalized rat Schwann cells (iSCs) (1 × 102/well) were exposed at four different conditions in 1 mT (50 Hz 1 h/d, 50 Hz 12 h/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12h/d). Cell proliferation, mRNA expression of S100 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) were analyzed. Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were divided into six groups (n = 10 each): control, sham, 50 Hz 1 h/d, 50 Hz 12 h/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12 Hr/d. Mental nerve was crush-injured and exposed at four different conditions in 1 mT (50 Hz 1 Hr/d, 50 Hz 12 Hr/d, 150 Hz 1 h/d and 150 Hz 12 h/d). Nerve regeneration was evaluated with functional test, histomorphometry and retrograde labeling of trigeminal ganglion. Results: iSCs proliferation with 50 Hz, 1 h/d was increased from fourth to seventh day; mRNA expression of S100 and BDNF was significantly increased at the same condition from first week to third week (p <.05 vs. control); difference score was increased at the second and third week, and gap score was increased at the third under 50 Hz 1 h PEMF compared with control while other conditions showed no statistical meaning. Axon counts and retrograde labeled neurons were significantly increased under PEMF of four different conditions compared with control. Although there was no statistical difference, 50 Hz, 1 h PEMF showed highest regeneration ability than other conditions. Conclusion: PEMF enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration, and that it may be due to cell proliferation and increase in BDNF and S100 gene expression.
KW - S100
KW - brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)
KW - crush nerve injury
KW - immortalized Schwann cells (iSCs)
KW - peripheral nerve regeneration
KW - pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs)
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945231620&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3109/00207454.2015.1054032
DO - 10.3109/00207454.2015.1054032
M3 - Article
C2 - 26010211
AN - SCOPUS:84945231620
SN - 0020-7454
VL - 126
SP - 739
EP - 748
JO - International Journal of Neuroscience
JF - International Journal of Neuroscience
IS - 8
ER -