Estimating Cumulative Damages due to Disruptions in Repetitive Construction

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Disruption to continuous workflow is a major cause of cost overruns affecting many construction projects, especially for repetitive construction. The compensatory claims for damages including disruption are different from damages due to delay because of the complex characteristics of disruption per se. To estimate the cumulative damages due to disruptions, all the possible issues of damages caused by interruption of workflow should be considered. Various methods have been proposed in the literature for analyzing the impact on schedules and the damages resulting from disruptions. However, these methods have a limitation because they do not consider the ripple effect of disruptions. This paper proposes a modified method that can reasonably estimate damages caused by disruptions in construction projects, especially for repetitive construction. The proposed method includes the resource continuity and earned value analysis research methodologies to forecast the direct effect of disruptions. In addition, earned value management (EVM) is utilized to demonstrate and forecast the ripple effect of disruptions on construction activities. The original contribution of the paper is summarized as (1) application of EVM to the topic of damage calculations due to changed process sequence and (2) development of a method to assess the ripple effect as well as the direct effect of disruptions on project productivity performance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number04016064
JournalJournal of Construction Engineering and Management - ASCE
Volume142
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2016

Keywords

  • Cost and schedule
  • Damages
  • Disruption
  • Earned value management (EVM)
  • Productivity loss
  • Ripple effect

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Estimating Cumulative Damages due to Disruptions in Repetitive Construction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this