TY - JOUR
T1 - Exploring the potential of hybrid green and blue methanol in achieving negative CO2 emissions
T2 - A carbon techno-economic perspective
AU - Kim, Taehyun
AU - Oh, Sebin
AU - Kim, Yungeon
AU - Park, Jinwoo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2025/3/15
Y1 - 2025/3/15
N2 - Owing to the versatile applications of methanol and its ability to utilize external CO2, numerous studies on e-methanol and bio-methanol are actively being conducted. However, these methanol processes face economic limitations due to the high levelized cost of methanol (LCOM). This study presents the design of a thermally integrated process that combines oxy-fuel combustion-based steam methane reforming (SMR) with high-temperature electrolysis technologies, specifically solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) or H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis cell (HCCEC). The thermal and energy efficiencies, as well as the LCOM of the SMR-SOEC and SMR-HCCEC processes, are compared to those of previously studied SMR-PEMEC (proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell) process. Among the three types of electrolyzers, the HCCEC demonstrated the highest values, achieving 70.1 % thermal efficiency and 65.1 % energy efficiency. High-temperature electrolysis processes yielded negative CO2 emission values of −0.173 tCO2 (SMR-SOEC) and −0.185 tCO2 (SMR-HCCEC) when synthesizing 1 ton of methanol. The LCOMs of the SMR-SOEC and SMR-HCCEC processes were $415.1/tMeOH and $391.8/tMeOH, respectively, both of which were lower than that of the SMR-PEMEC process ($437.3/tMeOH). Notably, the LCOM of the SMR-HCCEC process is comparable to that of the conventional SMR-based methanol process ($380/tMeOH). Considering the potential cost fluctuations of the HCCEC stack, the SMR-HCCEC process has significant potential for achieving a lower LCOM than the SMR-SOEC and SMR-PEMEC processes. This study is expected to play a significant role as an intermediate stage toward a transition from blue to green.
AB - Owing to the versatile applications of methanol and its ability to utilize external CO2, numerous studies on e-methanol and bio-methanol are actively being conducted. However, these methanol processes face economic limitations due to the high levelized cost of methanol (LCOM). This study presents the design of a thermally integrated process that combines oxy-fuel combustion-based steam methane reforming (SMR) with high-temperature electrolysis technologies, specifically solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC) or H2O/CO2 co-electrolysis cell (HCCEC). The thermal and energy efficiencies, as well as the LCOM of the SMR-SOEC and SMR-HCCEC processes, are compared to those of previously studied SMR-PEMEC (proton exchange membrane electrolysis cell) process. Among the three types of electrolyzers, the HCCEC demonstrated the highest values, achieving 70.1 % thermal efficiency and 65.1 % energy efficiency. High-temperature electrolysis processes yielded negative CO2 emission values of −0.173 tCO2 (SMR-SOEC) and −0.185 tCO2 (SMR-HCCEC) when synthesizing 1 ton of methanol. The LCOMs of the SMR-SOEC and SMR-HCCEC processes were $415.1/tMeOH and $391.8/tMeOH, respectively, both of which were lower than that of the SMR-PEMEC process ($437.3/tMeOH). Notably, the LCOM of the SMR-HCCEC process is comparable to that of the conventional SMR-based methanol process ($380/tMeOH). Considering the potential cost fluctuations of the HCCEC stack, the SMR-HCCEC process has significant potential for achieving a lower LCOM than the SMR-SOEC and SMR-PEMEC processes. This study is expected to play a significant role as an intermediate stage toward a transition from blue to green.
KW - Carbon techno-economic analysis
KW - HO/CO co-electrolysis
KW - Hybrid green-blue methanol
KW - Negative CO emissions
KW - Oxy-fuel combustion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218621559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2025.160910
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2025.160910
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85218621559
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 508
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 160910
ER -