Abstract
We claim that across-the-board (ATB) and right node raising (RNR) constructions in English should be analyzed in a uniform way, but neither of them can be on a par with parasitic gap (PG) constructions. To support this claim, we demonstrate that only the former two can license additive coordination (AC) and interwoven dependency (ID). We then offer a novel derivational analysis of the (un)availability of AC and ID in the three constructions. Specifically, we propose that cross-clausal conjunction via External Remerge (ER) constructs parallel coordinate structure in ATB and RNR while illegitimate linear ordering in the resulting multidominance structure is constrained by PF constraints; by contrast, ER does not yield the same kind of coordinate structure for PGs since subordination is required for the PG construction.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 141-181 |
| Number of pages | 41 |
| Journal | Linguistic Research |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Jun 2019 |
Keywords
- Additive coordination
- Conjunct Adjacency Condition
- Cyclic linearization
- External Remerge
- Interwoven dependency
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'External Remerge and linearization in ATB, RNR and PG constructions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver