TY - JOUR
T1 - Gradual and sudden enlightenment
T2 - The attainment of Yogipratyaksa a in the later Indian Yogācāra school
AU - Woo, Jeson
PY - 2009/4
Y1 - 2009/4
N2 - In the later Indian Yogācāra school, yogipratyaksa, the cognition of yogins is a key concept used to explain the Buddhist goal of enlightenment. It arises through the practice of meditation upon the Four Noble Truths. The method of the practice is to contemplate their aspects with attention (sādara), without interruption (nairantarya), and over a long period of time (dīrghakāla). A problem occurs in this position since Buddhists hold the theory of momentariness: how is possible that a yogin attains yogipratyaksa even when everything arises and perishes moment by moment. It is not possible for the momentary mind to fix on the object. Neither is the intensification of the practice possible in a stream composed of cognitions different at each moment. To provide a solution of this problem, a renown eleventh century Buddhist logician, Jñānaśrīmitra, assures us that momentariness is incompatible with duration (sthā yitā), but not with the occurrence of dissimilarity (visadrś otpāda). Even if cognitions are momentary, the vividness of an object continues to intensify in the course of each preceding cognition-moment producing, in turn, its following moment. Jñānaśrīmitra discusses the attainment of yogipratyaksa in terms of Buddhist ontological distinctions of moment (ksana) and continuum (santāna). At the level of the continuum, the process of enlightenment is considered gradual. By retaining a strict adherence to the final moment of the practice, on the other hand, the process is considered sudden.
AB - In the later Indian Yogācāra school, yogipratyaksa, the cognition of yogins is a key concept used to explain the Buddhist goal of enlightenment. It arises through the practice of meditation upon the Four Noble Truths. The method of the practice is to contemplate their aspects with attention (sādara), without interruption (nairantarya), and over a long period of time (dīrghakāla). A problem occurs in this position since Buddhists hold the theory of momentariness: how is possible that a yogin attains yogipratyaksa even when everything arises and perishes moment by moment. It is not possible for the momentary mind to fix on the object. Neither is the intensification of the practice possible in a stream composed of cognitions different at each moment. To provide a solution of this problem, a renown eleventh century Buddhist logician, Jñānaśrīmitra, assures us that momentariness is incompatible with duration (sthā yitā), but not with the occurrence of dissimilarity (visadrś otpāda). Even if cognitions are momentary, the vividness of an object continues to intensify in the course of each preceding cognition-moment producing, in turn, its following moment. Jñānaśrīmitra discusses the attainment of yogipratyaksa in terms of Buddhist ontological distinctions of moment (ksana) and continuum (santāna). At the level of the continuum, the process of enlightenment is considered gradual. By retaining a strict adherence to the final moment of the practice, on the other hand, the process is considered sudden.
KW - Buddhist epistemology
KW - Buddhist theory of momentariness
KW - Enlightenment
KW - Jñānaśrīmitra
KW - Perception
KW - Yogipratyaksa
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63949085488&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10781-008-9061-9
DO - 10.1007/s10781-008-9061-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:63949085488
SN - 0022-1791
VL - 37
SP - 179
EP - 188
JO - Journal of Indian Philosophy
JF - Journal of Indian Philosophy
IS - 2
ER -