TY - JOUR
T1 - High level of pre-treatment C-reactive protein to albumin ratio predicts inferior prognosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
AU - Jung, Jongheon
AU - Lee, Hyewon
AU - Heo, Ja Yoon
AU - Chang, Myung Hee
AU - Lee, Eunyoung
AU - Park, Weon Seo
AU - Park, Ju Hyun
AU - Eom, Hyeon Seok
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) has not been assessed in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL, the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma). This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of CAR in 186 DLBCL patients. A CAR value of 0.158 was selected as the most discriminative cut-off for identifying patients with high CAR values (73/141 patients, 51.8%). During a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the high CAR group had significantly poorer complete response to induction therapy (64.4% vs. 92.6%; p < 0.001), 3-year overall survival (OS) (68.3% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.0001), and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (53.5% vs. 88.0%; p < 0.0001). After adjusting for the International Prognostic Index components, a high CAR value independently predicted poor OS (HR: 6.02, 95% CI 1.19–30.38; p = 0.030) and PFS (HR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.40–9.36; p = 0.008). In an independent validation cohort (n = 50), patients with CAR > 0.158 also showed worse 3-year OS (47.9% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.0035) and 3-year PFS (36.1% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.0011). A high CAR remained significantly associated with poor outcomes for > 60-year-old patients (OS: p = 0.0038, PFS: p = 0.0015) and younger patients (OS: p = 0.0041, PFS: p = 0.0044). Among older patients, a high CAR value also predicted non-relapse mortality (p = 0.035). Therefore, the CAR might complement the International Prognostic Index in DLBCL cases.
AB - The C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio (CAR) has not been assessed in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL, the most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma). This retrospective study evaluated the prognostic value of CAR in 186 DLBCL patients. A CAR value of 0.158 was selected as the most discriminative cut-off for identifying patients with high CAR values (73/141 patients, 51.8%). During a median follow-up of 32.5 months, the high CAR group had significantly poorer complete response to induction therapy (64.4% vs. 92.6%; p < 0.001), 3-year overall survival (OS) (68.3% vs. 96.2%; p < 0.0001), and 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) (53.5% vs. 88.0%; p < 0.0001). After adjusting for the International Prognostic Index components, a high CAR value independently predicted poor OS (HR: 6.02, 95% CI 1.19–30.38; p = 0.030) and PFS (HR: 3.62, 95% CI 1.40–9.36; p = 0.008). In an independent validation cohort (n = 50), patients with CAR > 0.158 also showed worse 3-year OS (47.9% vs. 87.2%, p = 0.0035) and 3-year PFS (36.1% vs. 82.1%, p = 0.0011). A high CAR remained significantly associated with poor outcomes for > 60-year-old patients (OS: p = 0.0038, PFS: p = 0.0015) and younger patients (OS: p = 0.0041, PFS: p = 0.0044). Among older patients, a high CAR value also predicted non-relapse mortality (p = 0.035). Therefore, the CAR might complement the International Prognostic Index in DLBCL cases.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85099976689
U2 - 10.1038/s41598-021-82087-6
DO - 10.1038/s41598-021-82087-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 33514832
AN - SCOPUS:85099976689
SN - 2045-2322
VL - 11
JO - Scientific Reports
JF - Scientific Reports
IS - 1
M1 - 2674
ER -