Abstract
This study examined two conversion methods, M1 and M2, to predict finger/phalange bone lengths based on finger/phalange surface lengths. Forty-one Korean college students (25 males and 16 females) were recruited and their finger/phalange surface lengths, bone lengths and grip strengths were measured using a vernier caliper, an X-ray generator and a double-handle force measurement system, respectively. M1 and M2 were defined as formulas able to estimate finger/phalange bone lengths based on one dimension (i.e., surface hand length) and four finger dimensions (surface finger lengths), respectively. As a result of conversion, the estimation errors by M1 presented mean 1.22 mm, which was smaller than those (1.29 mm) by M2. The bone lengths estimated by M1 (mean r = 0.81) presented higher correlations with the measured bone lengths than those estimated by M2 (0.79). Thus, the M1 method was recommended in the present study, based on conversion simplicity and accuracy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 214-224 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 3 Apr 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- estimation error of finger bone lengths
- estimation of finger/bone lengths
- finger/phalange bone lengths
- finger/phalange surface lengths
- X-ray hand anthropometric data
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Investigation of methods for estimating hand bone dimensions using X-ray hand anthropometric data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver