TY - JOUR
T1 - Labor challenging AI-driven market creation
T2 - the case of South Korea’s AI-based digital textbooks
AU - Kim, Kyung Pil
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - This paper examines how workers’ collective action deterred the South Korean government and EdTech companies from implementing AI-Based Digital Textbooks (AIDTs). In 2023, introduction of AIDTs emerged amid the proliferation of generative AI and the government’s strong commitment to AI development. In partnership with EdTech companies, the Ministry of Education (MoE) sought to revolutionize classrooms by implementing AIDTs in public education. Led by a minister with close EdTech ties, the MoE argued that AIDTs represented educational innovation and would create new markets for capital accumulation. However, opposition emerged from progressive teacher unions, NGOs, and opposition parties once implementation strategies revealed significant problems: soaring costs, rushed top-down processes, the inferior AIDTs quality, private appropriation of personal data, and negative educational impacts. Clashes over AIDTs persisted during political upheaval that included a failed coup and presidential impeachment, but workers’ ongoing struggle, in conjunction with regime change, culminated in the National Assembly enacting legislation to block AIDTs introduction. South Korea’s experience reveals the pivotal role of workers’ strategies and solidarity and highlights the need for critical reflection on AI’s capitalist utilization and contradictions.
AB - This paper examines how workers’ collective action deterred the South Korean government and EdTech companies from implementing AI-Based Digital Textbooks (AIDTs). In 2023, introduction of AIDTs emerged amid the proliferation of generative AI and the government’s strong commitment to AI development. In partnership with EdTech companies, the Ministry of Education (MoE) sought to revolutionize classrooms by implementing AIDTs in public education. Led by a minister with close EdTech ties, the MoE argued that AIDTs represented educational innovation and would create new markets for capital accumulation. However, opposition emerged from progressive teacher unions, NGOs, and opposition parties once implementation strategies revealed significant problems: soaring costs, rushed top-down processes, the inferior AIDTs quality, private appropriation of personal data, and negative educational impacts. Clashes over AIDTs persisted during political upheaval that included a failed coup and presidential impeachment, but workers’ ongoing struggle, in conjunction with regime change, culminated in the National Assembly enacting legislation to block AIDTs introduction. South Korea’s experience reveals the pivotal role of workers’ strategies and solidarity and highlights the need for critical reflection on AI’s capitalist utilization and contradictions.
KW - AI
KW - AI-based digital textbooks
KW - EdTech
KW - public education
KW - South Korea
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021432251
U2 - 10.1080/0023656X.2025.2583921
DO - 10.1080/0023656X.2025.2583921
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105021432251
SN - 0023-656X
JO - Labor History
JF - Labor History
ER -