TY - JOUR
T1 - Model Predictive Control with Modulated Optimal Vector for a Three-Phase Inverter with an LC Filter
AU - Nguyen, Hoach The
AU - Kim, Eun Kyung
AU - Kim, Ik Pyo
AU - Choi, Han Ho
AU - Jung, Jin Woo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 1986-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - This paper proposes an effective model predictive control (MPC) scheme using a modulated optimal vector (MOV) and finite control options for a three-phase inverter with an LC filter. Unlike other MPC methods, the proposed MPC strategy exploits the unconstrained optimal vector (OV) of the continuous-control-set (CCS) MPC to limit the control options for the unconstrained mode. First, the analytical OV is derived based on a least-squares optimization. If the input constraints are not violated, the OV is applied with a space vector modulation (SVM) technique like the CCS-MPC. Otherwise, the OV is scaled into the MOV and only three control options are online evaluated to reselect the control input. Experiments are conducted on a three-phase inverter test bed with a TI TMS320F28335 digital signal processor to validate the improvements of the proposed method, especially the robust performances and fast responses. The comparative results with the FCS-MPC show the superior performances of the proposed scheme with smaller steady-state error and lower total harmonic distortion due to the analytical OV with SVM, more robustness to parameter uncertainties due to the disturbance observer, and faster dynamic response due to the online reselection of control inputs.
AB - This paper proposes an effective model predictive control (MPC) scheme using a modulated optimal vector (MOV) and finite control options for a three-phase inverter with an LC filter. Unlike other MPC methods, the proposed MPC strategy exploits the unconstrained optimal vector (OV) of the continuous-control-set (CCS) MPC to limit the control options for the unconstrained mode. First, the analytical OV is derived based on a least-squares optimization. If the input constraints are not violated, the OV is applied with a space vector modulation (SVM) technique like the CCS-MPC. Otherwise, the OV is scaled into the MOV and only three control options are online evaluated to reselect the control input. Experiments are conducted on a three-phase inverter test bed with a TI TMS320F28335 digital signal processor to validate the improvements of the proposed method, especially the robust performances and fast responses. The comparative results with the FCS-MPC show the superior performances of the proposed scheme with smaller steady-state error and lower total harmonic distortion due to the analytical OV with SVM, more robustness to parameter uncertainties due to the disturbance observer, and faster dynamic response due to the online reselection of control inputs.
KW - Finite control set (FCS)
KW - model predictive control (MPC)
KW - modulated optimal vector (MOV)
KW - space vector modulation (SVM)
KW - three-phase inverter
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038934889&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2694049
DO - 10.1109/TPEL.2017.2694049
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85038934889
SN - 0885-8993
VL - 33
SP - 2690
EP - 2703
JO - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
IS - 3
M1 - 7898789
ER -