TY - JOUR
T1 - Polybenzimidazole membranes for vanadium redox flow batteries
T2 - Effect of sulfuric acid doping conditions
AU - Mara Ikhsan, Muhammad
AU - Abbas, Saleem
AU - Do, Xuan Huy
AU - Choi, Seung Young
AU - Azizi, Kobra
AU - Hjuler, Hans Aage
AU - Jang, Jong Hyun
AU - Ha, Heung Yong
AU - Henkensmeier, Dirk
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Polybenzimidazole (PBI) has been considered as promising membrane material for all-vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) due to its compact morphology that can hinder vanadium crossover. However, its 2–4 mS cm−1 proton conductivity remains a challenge to achieve high energy efficiency. Recently developed PBI membranes showed conductivity up to 18 mS cm−1 by pre-treatment with phosphoric acid (PA) and up to 56 mS cm−1 with KOH. However, since the operation of VRFB uses sulfuric acid (SA), pre-treatment with different chemicals generates chemical wastes. Here we investigate the effects of pre-treaments with SA at various concentrations and temperatures. The optimized membrane (25C_10M, pretreated at 25 °C in 10M SA) increases its thickness during the treatment from 10 to 17 µm, and shows an improved conductivity in 2 M SA of 9.1 mS cm−1. In V4+ containing electrolyte, the area specific resistance was 262 mΩ cm2, which is 3.3 and 1.7 times better than for 10 µm thick standard PBI (13 µm thick in 2 M SA) and 54 µm thick Nafion 212 membranes, respectively. The selectivity is 458x104 S min cm−3, 7, 30, and 29 times better than for PA, KOH pre-swelling, and Nafion 212 membranes, respectively. A VRFB performance test with a 17 µm thick 25C_10M PBI membrane showed an energy efficiency of 89.6% at 80 mA cm−2.
AB - Polybenzimidazole (PBI) has been considered as promising membrane material for all-vanadium redox flow batteries (VRFBs) due to its compact morphology that can hinder vanadium crossover. However, its 2–4 mS cm−1 proton conductivity remains a challenge to achieve high energy efficiency. Recently developed PBI membranes showed conductivity up to 18 mS cm−1 by pre-treatment with phosphoric acid (PA) and up to 56 mS cm−1 with KOH. However, since the operation of VRFB uses sulfuric acid (SA), pre-treatment with different chemicals generates chemical wastes. Here we investigate the effects of pre-treaments with SA at various concentrations and temperatures. The optimized membrane (25C_10M, pretreated at 25 °C in 10M SA) increases its thickness during the treatment from 10 to 17 µm, and shows an improved conductivity in 2 M SA of 9.1 mS cm−1. In V4+ containing electrolyte, the area specific resistance was 262 mΩ cm2, which is 3.3 and 1.7 times better than for 10 µm thick standard PBI (13 µm thick in 2 M SA) and 54 µm thick Nafion 212 membranes, respectively. The selectivity is 458x104 S min cm−3, 7, 30, and 29 times better than for PA, KOH pre-swelling, and Nafion 212 membranes, respectively. A VRFB performance test with a 17 µm thick 25C_10M PBI membrane showed an energy efficiency of 89.6% at 80 mA cm−2.
KW - interchain spacing
KW - Polybenzimidazole
KW - Pre-treatment
KW - Redox flow battery
KW - Sulfuric acid
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123843547
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134902
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2022.134902
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85123843547
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 435
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 134902
ER -