TY - JOUR
T1 - Radiotherapy for bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma
T2 - a hybrid systematic review with meta-analyses
AU - Rim, Chai Hong
AU - Park, Sunmin
AU - Yoon, Won Sup
AU - Shin, In Soo
AU - Park, Hee Chul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2022 Taylor & Francis Group LLC.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Introduction: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is commonly used as a palliative treatment for bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We planned a hybrid systematic review that meta-analyzed the efficacy and feasibility of EBRT and reviewed the literature to answer specific clinical questions. Methods: The PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through 1 December 2021. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were comparative data, including treatment response and survival related to dose escalation, number of metastases, and fractionation scheme. Formal pooled analyses were performed on the primary endpoints, and the secondary endpoints were systematically reviewed. Complications were also reviewed. Results: Nineteen studies involving 1613 patients with HCC and bone metastases were included. The median OS was 6 months (range: 3–13 months). The pooled one-year OS was 23.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.4–28.6); pooled pain RR was 81.5% (95% CI: 76.4–85.7) and of pain complete remission was 26.5% (95% CI: 21.7–32.0). Pain response might be related to dose escalation, considering the moderate consistency of results and plausibility, with a low-quality grade of evidence†. Considering the indeterminate results, we cannot suggest that dose escalation is correlated with OS. The oligometastasis status might be related to better OS, considering the high consistency of results and plausibility with low to moderate quality of evidence. Hypofractionated EBRT might yield comparable efficacy to conventional EBRT, with a low-quality grade of evidence. There were few complications of grade ≥3, except for hematologic complications, which ranged from 11.5to 34%. Conclusion: EBRT is an efficient and feasible palliative option. Clinical consideration of hematologic complications is necessary. Future studies are needed to increase the quality of evidence for actual clinical questions. †Reference to a system of the American Society for Radiation Oncology primary liver cancer clinical guidelines.
AB - Introduction: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is commonly used as a palliative treatment for bone metastases of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We planned a hybrid systematic review that meta-analyzed the efficacy and feasibility of EBRT and reviewed the literature to answer specific clinical questions. Methods: The PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched through 1 December 2021. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and response rate (RR). Secondary endpoints were comparative data, including treatment response and survival related to dose escalation, number of metastases, and fractionation scheme. Formal pooled analyses were performed on the primary endpoints, and the secondary endpoints were systematically reviewed. Complications were also reviewed. Results: Nineteen studies involving 1613 patients with HCC and bone metastases were included. The median OS was 6 months (range: 3–13 months). The pooled one-year OS was 23.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 18.4–28.6); pooled pain RR was 81.5% (95% CI: 76.4–85.7) and of pain complete remission was 26.5% (95% CI: 21.7–32.0). Pain response might be related to dose escalation, considering the moderate consistency of results and plausibility, with a low-quality grade of evidence†. Considering the indeterminate results, we cannot suggest that dose escalation is correlated with OS. The oligometastasis status might be related to better OS, considering the high consistency of results and plausibility with low to moderate quality of evidence. Hypofractionated EBRT might yield comparable efficacy to conventional EBRT, with a low-quality grade of evidence. There were few complications of grade ≥3, except for hematologic complications, which ranged from 11.5to 34%. Conclusion: EBRT is an efficient and feasible palliative option. Clinical consideration of hematologic complications is necessary. Future studies are needed to increase the quality of evidence for actual clinical questions. †Reference to a system of the American Society for Radiation Oncology primary liver cancer clinical guidelines.
KW - bone metastasis
KW - external beam radiation therapy
KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - liver cancer
KW - metastasis
KW - radiotherapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135708954&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09553002.2022.2094020
DO - 10.1080/09553002.2022.2094020
M3 - Article
C2 - 35758976
AN - SCOPUS:85135708954
SN - 0955-3002
VL - 99
SP - 419
EP - 430
JO - International Journal of Radiation Biology
JF - International Journal of Radiation Biology
IS - 3
ER -