Refining Urban Park Accessibility and Service Coverage Assessment Using a Building-Level Population Allocation Model: Evidence from Yongsan-gu, Seoul, Korea

Urban neighborhood parks are essential infrastructure for sustainable cities, supporting physical and mental health, social cohesion, and climate adaptation. Equity-oriented park planning, however, requires accurate identification of residents who can access parks within network-constrained travel time thresholds. Many accessibility studies estimate served populations using coarse administrative zones and areal-weighting assumptions, which can bias results in heterogeneous, vertically developed districts. This study develops a building-based population allocation framework (implemented via a building centroid overlay) that integrates Statistics Korea’s census output areas (2023 Q4 release) with the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (MOLIT)’s GIS Integrated Building Information database (2023 Q4 release) and applies it to Yongsan-gu (Yongsan District), Seoul. Park entrances were verified and digitized using street-view imagery available on multiple web map platforms, and walkable service areas (5 and 10 min) were delineated via network analysis. Potential service coverage and unserved population were then estimated under three spatial configurations—administrative dong (neighborhood-level administrative unit in Seoul; hereafter administrative unit), census output area, and building-based allocation—and compared. Under the 10 min scenario, the unserved share reached 24.6% at the administrative unit level but decreased to 5.9% and 4.3% when using census output areas and building-based allocation, respectively. The building-based approach additionally revealed micro-scale clusters of unserved residents near localized pedestrian constraints and boundary-crossing areas that are obscured by zone-based methods. These findings demonstrate the sensitivity of access-based potential service coverage diagnostics to spatial unit choice and population disaggregation and suggest that building-based population allocation can improve the targeting of park pro-vision policies and promote spatial equity in dense, vertically developed cities.