Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Risk of cancer among patients with depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and implications

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

32 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The question of cancer risk in individuals with depression is unclear, primarily because of the heterogeneity of the assessment of depression in the published literature. To clarify the mixed findings, this analysis was limited to articles that used a reliable method of ascertaining depressive disorder. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify studies investigating the effect of depression on subsequent risk of cancer, defining depression based on the criteria in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and/or the International Classification of Disease (ICD). We calculated a pooled odds ratio (OR) for developing cancer with the 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Nine studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria. In a random-effects model, patients with depressive disorder were at increased risk for cancer (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06–1.50, P = 0.01). However, a significant effect was observed only in low-quality studies (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05–1.63, P = 0.018), and not in high-quality studies (OR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.85–1.56, P = 0.366). Conclusion: Our results did not demonstrate that people with depressive disorder are at increased risk for developing cancer. Well-designed prospective studies of recurrent or persistent depressive disorder that control for lifestyle factors including smoking are warranted.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1393-1399
Number of pages7
JournalPsycho-Oncology
Volume25
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2016

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Risk of cancer among patients with depressive disorder: a meta-analysis and implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this