Spillover Effects of Analyst Coverage on IPO Firms

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of analysts’ recommendations and earnings forecasts for newly listed firms in the same industry. IPO underpricing is significantly lower as the number of firms whose investment recommendations are upgraded increases, supporting the contagion effect hypothesis that a high affinity for the industry has a positive effect on the IPO offer price. However, as the number of listed firms with higher earnings forecasts increases, IPO underpricing is higher, which supports the competitive effect hypothesis that the profit growth of competitors negatively affects IPO firms’ competitiveness. The effects vary depending on the competitive positions of both listed firms and IPO firms within the industry. The results also show that in industries with high concentration (i.e. low competition), analyst information on listed firms has a greater contagion effect, while the competition effect hypothesis that better earnings forecasts for rival firms negatively affect IPO firms’ competitive position is not supported. This study contributes to the literature by analyzing the information spillover effect of analyst coverage in the IPO market by showing that the effects vary depending on the firms’ competitive positions as well as industry competition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)473-496
Number of pages24
JournalKorean Journal of Financial Studies
Volume50
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Analyst Recommendation
  • Competitive Effect
  • Contagion Effect
  • Earing Forecast
  • IPO

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Spillover Effects of Analyst Coverage on IPO Firms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this