Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors for endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with and without cancer

  • TREAT-AIS and CRCS-K investigators
  • Sin-Lau Christian Hospital, Taiwan
  • Chi-Mei Medical Center
  • National Sun Yat-sen University
  • Seoul National University
  • National Taiwan University
  • Taipei Medical University
  • Eulji University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taipei
  • Landseed International Hospital
  • Chang Gung University
  • Dong-A University
  • Seoul Medical Center
  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
  • Soonchunhyang University
  • Yeungnam University
  • Inje University
  • I-Shou University
  • Hallym University
  • Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital Taiwan
  • Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital
  • Chonnam National University
  • Veterans General Hospital-Taichung Taiwan
  • Jeju National University
  • University of Ulsan
  • Chungbuk National University
  • Keimyung University
  • Chung-Ang University
  • Korea University
  • Kyung Hee University
  • National Defense University Taiwan
  • Chia-Yi Christian Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Purpose: The benefits and risks of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and a history of cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to assess procedural effectiveness, safety, clinical outcomes, and their trends over time. Methods: We analyzed data from 2011 to 2023 from binational EVT registries in Taiwan and South Korea. Patients with a history of cancer were propensity score matched (1:2) to non-cancer controls based on age, stroke severity, risk factors, imaging, and treatment. Outcomes included reperfusion, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), early neurological deterioration (END), in-hospital and 90-day mortality, and favorable 90-day outcomes. Results: Of 6526 stroke patients who received EVT, 473 (7.2 %) had cancer. After matching, 294 cancer patients were compared with 549 controls. Successful reperfusion and SICH rates were similar. Cancer patients had higher END (17.0 % vs. 10.4 %), in-hospital mortality (19.0 % vs. 8.6 %), 90-day mortality (35.4 % vs. 16.2 %), and lower chances of favorable 90-day outcomes (23.1 % vs. 35.7 %). Higher HDL and platelet count in cancer patients were linked to better outcomes. The proportion of cancer patients undergoing EVT increased over time with improved reperfusion and lower SICH rates. Conclusions: EVT is safe and effective for AIS patients with cancer, with similar reperfusion and complication rates as non-cancer patients. However, they often have worse outcomes. Laboratory markers can help personalize prognosis. Evolving treatment patterns suggest increasing clinician confidence in this group. However, due to missing cancer-specific details, our findings should not be generalized to all cancer populations, especially those with advanced or terminal malignancies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of the Formosan Medical Association
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Acute ischemic stroke
  • Cancer
  • Effectiveness
  • Endovascular thrombectomy
  • Safety
  • Stroke registry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Temporal trends, outcomes, and predictors for endovascular thrombectomy in acute stroke patients with and without cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this