The Association Between Nut Consumption and Risk of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Accumulating evidence suggests that dietary factors such as nuts may play a role in depressive symptoms. Yet, existing evidence regarding the relationship between nut consumption and depressive symptoms remains inconsistent. To clarify this association, we conducted a meta-analysis. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for observational studies on the relationship between nut consumption and depressive symptoms published up to September 2025. Summary relative risks (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the DerSimonian–Laird random effects model. Results: A total of seven observational studies, comprising 70,136 participants, were included. Higher nut consumption was significantly associated with a lower risk of depressive symptoms (SRRs = 0.75, 95% CIs, 0.67–0.85; p < 0.001, I2 = 15%, Pheterogeneity = 0.31). Compared to <1 time/week of nut consumption, the inverse relationship was significant for ≥3 times/week of nut consumption (SRRs = 0.75, 95% CIs = 0.63–0.89, p = 0.001, I2 = 0%, Pheterogeneity = 0.93), but not for 1 to <3 times/week of nut consumption (SRRs = 0.93, 95% CIs = 0.69–1.24, p = 0.62, I2 = 52%, Pheterogeneity = 0.10). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis of observational studies found that higher nut consumption was associated with a reduced risk of depressive symptoms, particularly when intake reached at least three servings per week. Further research, especially randomized controlled trials, is needed to understand the underlying mechanisms.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3810
JournalNutrients
Volume17
Issue number24
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • depressive symptoms
  • meta-analysis
  • nut consumption

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Association Between Nut Consumption and Risk of Depressive Symptoms: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this