Abstract
Adopting an institutional logics perspective, this study examines various fact-checking practices in the context of three field-level logics that may shape these practices: a journalistic logic, a social-service logic, and a market logic. We conceptualize fact-checking sites as hybrid operations that are likely to be shaped by multiple logics, but which may show signs of standardization. Findings from a content analysis of diverse fact-checkers showed a vibrancy and similarity of stand-alone fact-checkers, suggesting these may be a budding institutional form. However, findings also reveal a field that is diverse in its organizational types, practices, and logics.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1437-1460 |
| Number of pages | 24 |
| Journal | Digital Journalism |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2024 |
Keywords
- Fact-checking
- institutional logics
- journalism ethics
- transparency