Theorizing the More-Than-Human State

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article seeks to explore the possibilities of theorizing the more-than-human state (MTHS), by paying attention to the agentive and affective power of nonhumans as social forces—qualities that are usually believed to belong only to humans—in constructing the state’s form and strategies. For this task, I attempt to contribute to a self-reflexive debate on the strategic-relational approach (SRA), one of the key theoretical resources for research on capitalist states, vis-à-vis a more-than-human geographical perspective, while suggesting that the “human-centric” SRA could be modified to fit the MTHS theorization. More specifically, I first discuss the political and ecological significance of the SRA, as well as the anthropocentrism that remains unchallenged in this approach. Then I explore cases that have taken place in South Korea that reveal signs of the changing state form from a more-than-human perspective, while sketching out a more-than-human framework for the SRA, which reveals a new contact zone between state theory and more-than-human geography.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)641-649
Number of pages9
JournalProfessional Geographer
Volume73
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Bob Jessop
  • more-than-human geography
  • more-than-human state
  • state theory
  • strategic-relational approach

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Theorizing the More-Than-Human State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this