TY - JOUR
T1 - Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for determination of the mitral valve area after mitral valve repair surgery for mitral stenosis
AU - Kang, Woon Seok
AU - Ko, Sung Min
AU - Lee, Younsuk
AU - Oh, Chung Sik
AU - Kwon, Mi Young
AU - Muhammad, Hasmizy
AU - Kim, Seong Hyop
AU - Kim, Tae Yop
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.
PY - 2016/8
Y1 - 2016/8
N2 - BACKGROUND: Pressure half-time (PHT) method is usually unreliable for accurate determination of mitral valve area (MVA) immediately after surgical intervention of mitral stenosis (MS). The planimetry method using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (3D-planimetery method) could enhance accurate determination of the intraoperative MVA. Authors investigated the efficacy of 3D-planimetry method in determining MVA immediately after mitral valve repair procedure (MVRep) for severe mitral stenosis (MS). METHODS: In severe MS patients undergoing elective MVRep (N.=41), intraoperative MVAs were determined by using PHT-method and 3D-planimetry method before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (pre- and post-MVAPHT, and -MVA3D-planmetry). MVAs were also determined by using multi-detector computed tomographic scan (MDCT) before MVRep and within 7 days after MVRep (pre- and post-MVACT). MVAs determined by using three different methods were analysed. RESULTS: Mitral inflow pressure gradient (median [25th-75th percentile]) was significantly reduced after MVRep (3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 7.0 [6.0-9.0] mmHg; P<.001). Pre-MVAPHT, pre-MVA3D-planimetryand preop-MVACT (mean [95% confidence interval]) did not differ significantly (1.08 [1.00-1.05], 1.08 [0.98-1.08], and 1.14 [1.07-1.22] cm2, respectively), but post-MVA3planimetry and post-MVACT(2.22 [2.07-2.36] and 2.31 [2.07-2.36] cm2, respectively) were significantly larger than post-MVAPHT (1.98 [1.83-2.13] cm2; P=0.007 and P<.001, respectively). The correlation coefficient between post-MVA3D-planimetry and post-MVACT (0.59, P<.01) was greater than that between post-MVAPHT and post-MVACT (0.39, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the clinical efficacy of 3D-planimetry for accurate evaluation of the MVA immediately after MVRep for severe MS, as a valuable alternative to PHT-method which usually underestimates MVA during this period.
AB - BACKGROUND: Pressure half-time (PHT) method is usually unreliable for accurate determination of mitral valve area (MVA) immediately after surgical intervention of mitral stenosis (MS). The planimetry method using three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (3D-planimetery method) could enhance accurate determination of the intraoperative MVA. Authors investigated the efficacy of 3D-planimetry method in determining MVA immediately after mitral valve repair procedure (MVRep) for severe mitral stenosis (MS). METHODS: In severe MS patients undergoing elective MVRep (N.=41), intraoperative MVAs were determined by using PHT-method and 3D-planimetry method before and immediately after cardiopulmonary bypass (pre- and post-MVAPHT, and -MVA3D-planmetry). MVAs were also determined by using multi-detector computed tomographic scan (MDCT) before MVRep and within 7 days after MVRep (pre- and post-MVACT). MVAs determined by using three different methods were analysed. RESULTS: Mitral inflow pressure gradient (median [25th-75th percentile]) was significantly reduced after MVRep (3.0 [2.0-4.0] vs. 7.0 [6.0-9.0] mmHg; P<.001). Pre-MVAPHT, pre-MVA3D-planimetryand preop-MVACT (mean [95% confidence interval]) did not differ significantly (1.08 [1.00-1.05], 1.08 [0.98-1.08], and 1.14 [1.07-1.22] cm2, respectively), but post-MVA3planimetry and post-MVACT(2.22 [2.07-2.36] and 2.31 [2.07-2.36] cm2, respectively) were significantly larger than post-MVAPHT (1.98 [1.83-2.13] cm2; P=0.007 and P<.001, respectively). The correlation coefficient between post-MVA3D-planimetry and post-MVACT (0.59, P<.01) was greater than that between post-MVAPHT and post-MVACT (0.39, P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the clinical efficacy of 3D-planimetry for accurate evaluation of the MVA immediately after MVRep for severe MS, as a valuable alternative to PHT-method which usually underestimates MVA during this period.
KW - Anesthesia
KW - Cardiac imaging techniques
KW - Mitral valve annulus repair
KW - Mitral valve stenosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84991271504&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 25475916
AN - SCOPUS:84991271504
SN - 0021-9509
VL - 57
SP - 606
EP - 614
JO - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 4
ER -