Traffic violations versus driving errors of older adults: Informing clinical practice

Sherrilene Classen, Orit Shechtman, Kezia D. Awadzi, Yongsung Joo, Desiree N. Lanford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

48 Scopus citations

Abstract

Certain driving errors are predictive of crashes, but whether the type of errors evaluated during on-road assessment is similar to traffic violations that are associated with crashes is unknown. Using the crash data of 5,345 older drivers and expert reviewers, we constructed a violation-to-error classification based on rater agreement. We examined the effects of predictor variables on crash-related injuries by risk probability using logistic regression. Drivers' mean age was 76.08 (standard deviation = 7.10); 45.7% were women. Of drivers, 44.6% sustained crash-related injuries, and female drivers had a higher injury probability (44%) than male drivers (29% Lane maintenance, yielding, and gap acceptance errors predicted crash-related injuries with almost 50% probability; speed regulation (34%), vehicle positioning (25%), and adjustmentto-stimuli (21%) errors predicted crash-related injuries to a lesser degree. We suggest injury prevention strategies for clinicians and researchers to consider for older drivers, especially older women.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy
Volume64
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2010

Keywords

  • Accidents
  • Aged
  • Aged 80 and over
  • Automobile driving
  • Risk
  • Traffic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traffic violations versus driving errors of older adults: Informing clinical practice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this